REVIEWED METHODOLOGY查看源文档
使用边界这是用于组织调查、证据和复核的方法框架;重要事实需以最新主源验证,财经内容不构成投资建议。
Sector Thesis Schema
Use this reference when turning a sector discussion into a durable artifact or when testing whether a catalyst falsifies a first-principles thesis.
Core Thesis Object
Recommended JSON shape:
{
"as_of": "YYYY-MM-DD",
"sector": "AI hardware",
"markets": ["US", "HK", "CN"],
"question": "Did the catalyst falsify the sector thesis?",
"not_investment_advice": true,
"core_thesis": {
"one_sentence": "",
"first_principles_driver": "capex_cycle | supply_shortage | product_cycle | policy | commodity_cycle | liquidity | replacement_cycle | other",
"required_chain": [
{
"link": "demand_impulse",
"claim": "",
"current_evidence": [],
"falsification_trigger": "",
"status": "confirmed | weakened | falsified | unknown"
}
]
},
"events": [
{
"event_date": "YYYY-MM-DD",
"event": "",
"source_class": "primary | official | reported | analyst_view | market_price | rumor",
"attacked_links": ["supply_bottleneck"],
"classification": "confirmation | narrative_shock | partial_thesis_attack | first_principles_falsifier | valuation_or_crowding_reset | macro_or_liquidity_beta | unknown",
"reasoning": "",
"missing_evidence": []
}
],
"lead_lag": {
"window": "after_us_close | asia_preopen | local_session | multi_day",
"signals": []
},
"companies": [
{
"name": "",
"ticker": "",
"role": "core_beneficiary | bottleneck_supplier | equipment_or_capacity | upstream_input | downstream_customer | platform_or_aggregator | satellite_option | macro_beta | needs_evidence",
"thesis_capture": "",
"proof_metrics": ["revenue", "orders", "backlog", "ASP", "gross_margin", "inventory", "capex", "capacity", "guidance"],
"invalidators": [],
"source_gaps": []
}
],
"scenarios": [
{
"case": "base | positive | negative",
"trigger": "",
"sector_implication": "",
"company_implication": "",
"time_horizon": "same_day | 1-2_weeks | next_earnings | multi_quarter"
}
],
"source_gaps": []
}
Required Chain Links
Use these links as the default sector thesis chain:
| Link | Question | Proof | Common falsifier |
|---|---|---|---|
demand_impulse |
Why does end demand accelerate now? | customer capex, adoption, utilization, policy target, order intake | capex cut, adoption stalls, lower utilization, cancellations |
spending_or_orders |
Does demand become measurable spend? | purchase orders, backlog, shipment guide, contract value | guide down, backlog burn without replenishment, delayed projects |
supply_bottleneck |
Why can supply not respond immediately? | long lead time, scarce input, capacity constraint, qualification cycle | capacity arrives faster than demand, substitute appears, lead times normalize |
pricing_power |
Can the chain raise price or hold price? | ASP, spot price, contract price, rental price, utilization | ASP decline, price war, rental-price compression |
profit_conversion |
Does revenue become earnings/cash flow? | gross margin, operating leverage, cash conversion, ROIC | margin squeeze, inventory build, receivables stretch, capex overrun |
valuation_positioning |
Is rerating still supported? | earnings revisions, breadth, institutional flow, valuation vs growth | crowded unwind, multiple compression, liquidity shock |
Evidence Quality
Use this source hierarchy:
- Company IR, exchange filings, SEC/HKEX/CNINFO/SSE/SZSE filings, official guidance, official customer/supplier announcements.
- Earnings calls, investor presentations, official conference materials.
- Reputable news with named sources or documents.
- Broker/analyst views, channel checks, supply-chain checks.
- Social media, forums, unsourced screenshots, price action.
Only levels 1-2 should normally support first_principles_falsifier. Levels 3-5 can support narrative_shock, reported_claim, or needs_verification.
Falsification Matrix
| Event type | First question | Strong falsifier | Softer interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Customer capex headline | Is spend cut or merely reallocated? | official capex guide down, order cancellation | headline changes sentiment but order book unchanged |
| Capacity expansion | Does new capacity arrive before demand? | credible capacity schedule exceeds demand and prices fall | expansion validates demand but raises future cycle risk |
| Price decline | Is price decline broad and durable? | contract/spot price breaks margin thesis | normal seasonal decline or mix shift |
| Big customer becomes competitor | Does it replace suppliers? | customer cancels external orders or insources at scale | bargaining pressure, not immediate loss |
| Policy restriction | Does it block revenue or raise cost? | export ban, license denial, subsidy removal | compliance delay, mix shift |
| Earnings miss | Is miss in thesis segment? | core segment order/margin guide down | unrelated segment, FX/timing, one-off |
| Sharp price fall | Is there fundamental evidence? | selloff plus primary evidence against chain | valuation/crowding reset |
Company Mapping Rules
- A company is
core_beneficiaryonly if the thesis can be linked to a material segment, customer, or product line. - A company is
bottleneck_supplieronly when its product is scarce, hard to qualify, or capacity-constrained. - A company is
satellite_optionwhen it benefits only in a second-order way or lacks disclosed exposure. - A company is
macro_betawhen the move is mostly index, liquidity, commodity, or FX driven. - Use
needs_evidencewhen the connection is plausible but not yet sourced.
Output Discipline
Write conclusions as conditional:
- "The thesis is not falsified unless..."
- "This is a narrative shock until..."
- "It becomes first-principles damage if..."
- "The company remains only a satellite exposure unless..."
Never convert this schema into direct trade instructions.